Der Pharma Chemica
Journal for Medicinal Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemistry

Research Article - Der Pharma Chemica ( 2019) Volume 11, Issue 1

Reversed Phase-UPLC Separation Analysis of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin from Their Degradants

Srikanth Kanithi and Naga Sesha Sai Pavan Kumar Chebolu*
 
Department of Sciences and Humanities, Chemistry Division, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522 213, India
 
*Corresponding Author:
Naga Sesha Sai Pavan Kumar Chebolu, Department of Sciences and Humanities, Chemistry Division, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522 213, India,

Abstract

A simple, expeditious, and explicit stability-indicating Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) analytical method was developed and validated for the quantitative analysis of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin in bulk drugs and combined dosage formulations. The method was validated by using Acquity UPLC HSS C18 (100 mm × 1.8 μ) column, the column temperature was maintained at 25°C and the run time 3 min. The mobile phase was a mixture of Mobile Phase: A–Acetonitrile, B–0.1% Ortho Phosphoric acid in water, injection volume of samples was 1 μl and the UV detection λmax at 256 nm. The retention times were discerned as 1.76, 2.11 min and the linearity range was covered from 2.5 μg/ml to 15 μg/ml, 18.75 μg/ml to 112.5 μg/ml of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin respectively. The validation of the method established as per ICH guide lines and the method proved that separation of different degradation products along with the pure drugs were found to be capable of giving swift retention times with fine resolution than that achieved with conventional UPLC. This method exhibited an excellent performance in terms of sensitivity and swift and the results of stress testing was undertaken according to the ICH guidelines reveal that the method is specific and stable and the method has the ability to separate these drugs individually and from their degradation products in solid dosage forms and hence this method can be used for routine analysis in quality control.

Keywords

Stability indicating assay, RP-UPLC, Amitriptyline, Pregabalin, Forced degradation studies

Introduction

Amitriptyline

Amitriptyline with chemical name, 3-(10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptene-5-ylidene)-N,N-dimethylpropan-1-amine (Figure 1) is a tricyclic antidepressant, and is a derivative of dibenzocyclo heptadiene and a tricyclic antidepressant. Amitriptyline restrain the re-uptake of norepinephrine and serotonin by the presynaptic neuronal membrane in the Central Nervous System (CNS), thereby increasing the synaptic concentration of norepinephrine and serotonin. Due to constant stimulation to these receptors, amitriptyline may produce a down regulation of adrenergic and serotonin receptors, which may contribute to the antidepressant activity. Amitriptyline is used to treat a number of medicinal stipulations including major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and less commonly attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and bipolar disorder [1-3]. Molecular formula and molecular weight of Amitriptyline are C20H23N and 277.403 g/mol respectively. Appearance of Amitriptyline is a white to off-white powder with a freely soluble in water at 25°C.

derpharmachemica-Amitriptyline

Figure 1: Structure of Amitriptyline

Pregabalin

Pregabalin with chemical name, (3S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid (Figure 2) is a γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) derivative that acts as a calcium channel blocker and is used as an anticonvulsant as well as an anti-anxiety agent. It is also used as an analgesic in the treatment of neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia. Pregabalin drug is used to treat epilepsy, neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, and generalized anxiety disorder [4,5]. Its use for epilepsy is as an add-on therapy for partial seizures with or without secondary generalization in adults. Molecular formula and molecular weight of Pregabalin are C8H17NO2 159.23 g/mol respectively. Appearance of Pregabalin is a white to off-white crystalline powder with freely soluble water at 25°C.

derpharmachemica-Chemical-Structure

Figure 2: Chemical Structure of Pregabalin

Materials and Methods

Drug substances

Working standards Amitriptyline (99.9%) and Pregabalin (99.9%) were procured from Spectrum Pharma Labs, Hyderabad, India.

Instrumentation

An Agilent-1100, Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography consisting of ACQUITY Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) Binary Solvent Manager (part numbers: 186015002), ACQUITY UPLC Sample Manager (part numbers: 186015005) and Waters Empower 2 workstation, Waters Acquity column manager (Part number: 186015007), Waters PDA detector (Part numbers: 186015032), supplied by M/s. Waters, USA. Mettler-Toledo analytical balance, model AG-245 capable of weighing 0.01 mg, supplied by M/s. Mettler AG, Switzerland. Sonicator supplied by M/s. Serwell instrument, India. Digital pH meter supplied by M/s. Serwell instruments, India.

Chemicals and reagents

HPLC grade Acetonitrile was supplied by Merck, India. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) grade Orthophosphoric acid supplied by Merck, Bangalore, India. HPLC grade water was supplied by Merck, India.

Mobile phase preparation

Mobile Phase composition: A-0.1% Orto phosphoric acid A in water, B- Acetonitrile, Diluent-Water: ACN (50: 50).

Standard solution preparation

Weighed and transferred 10 mg of Amitriptyline [6-11] and 18.75 mg of Pregabalin [12-15] standards into a 100 ml and 25 ml volumetric flask, add 3/4th volume of diluent, sonicated for 5 min till the sample is dissolved and make up to the final volume with diluent. Pipetted 1 ml of each from the above two stock solutions were taken into a 10 ml volumetric flask and made up to the volume with diluent.

Chromatographic conditions

The mobile phase was a mixture of Mobile Phase: A-0.1% OPA in water and B-Acetonitrile [16]. The contents of the mobile phase were filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filter, degassed for 10 min before it used and flushed the column at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min, Column: Acquity UPLC HSS C18 (100 × 1.8 μm). The column temperature was maintained at 25°C and run time is 3 min. The injection volume of samples was 1 μl. UV detection was carried out by using a UV-DAD detector at 256 nm.

Method development

After number of experiments [17], different composition of 0.1% OPA, methanol and Acetonitrile were tried with different columns (Acquity UPLC HSS PFP (75 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm and ACQUITY UPLC, with HSS T3 Column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm). The separation of peaks is not satisfactory. The optimum chromatographic conditions were established for better separation, repeatability and reproducibility. For each drug separate standard calibration lines were constructed. A sequence of linearity solutions was prepared from the above stock solutions by using mobile phase to get the concentrations Amitriptyline: 2.5-15 μg/ml Pregabalin: 18.75-112.5 μg/ml. Each concentration was injected 6 times and each time peak area and retention time was recorded separately for both the drugs. Calibration curves were constructed by taking average peak area on Y-axis and concentration on X-axis. From the calibration curves, regression equations were calculated as shown in the Figures 3 and 4. These equations were used for the estimation of drug content in their combined tablet dosage form.

derpharmachemica-Calibration-curve

Figure 3: Calibration curve for Amitriptyline

derpharmachemica-Pregabalin

Figure 4: Calibration curve for Pregabalin

Pharmaceutical formulation estimation

For the analysis of solid drug dosage form, 1 tablet was weighed, powdered in mortar and powder was transferred into a 100 ml volumetric flask. Dissolved with 50 ml diluent and sonicated for 25 min, diluted up to the mark with the same. It was filtered through a nylon 0.45 mm membrane filter. From above solution 1 ml was transferred into 10 ml volumetric flasks and diluted with mobile phase to get the required test concentrations, 10 mg/ml of Amitriptyline and 75 mg/ml of Pregabalin. Injected 6 times into the column, chromatograms and respective peak areas were measured. The content of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin were calculated by using the regression equation which was indicated as % Assay. The results are tabulated in Table 1.

Drug name Labelled claim (mg) Test concentration (μg/ml) Mean Amount estimated (μg/ml) n=6 Estimated amount %
Amitriptyline 10 10 9.87 99.59
Pregabalin 75 75 74.86 99.44

Table 1: Pharmaceutical formulation estimation

Validation

In this validation repeatability and reproducibility proved for analytical method will consistently produce results meeting its intended analytical applications [18-20].

Accuracy

The recoveries of each drug at three different levels ranging from (50% to 150%) with target concentration of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin (active ingredient) from 5 μg/ml to 15 μg/ml, 37.5 μg/ml to 112.5 μg/ml respectively by adding a known amount of each of the standard to a pre-analysed concentration of all drugs (Amitriptyline and Pregabalin) and calculating the % of recovery. The recovery range and % RSD for all drug found to be 99.2% to 99.8% and 0.38% to 0.70% respectively. The results were tabulated in Table 2.

Drugs name Pre analysed concentration (µg/ml) Amount added (µg/ml) Amount found (µg/ml) (n=3) %Recovery
Amitriptyline 10 5 4.97 99.4
10 9.87 98.7
15 14.9 99.3
% RSD       0.38%
Pregabalin 75 37.5 37.2 99.2
75 74.9 99.8
112.5 110.7 98.4
% RSD       0.70%

Table 2: Results of the recovery studies

Precision

The precision of the system was tested by six (n=6) injections and the assay value, % RSD, RT and areas were determined in Table 3. The same day and different days variation in assay calculated and the obtained % RSD were 0.2% to 0.9%, 0.8% to 0.8% respectively. The %RSD value were found be <1.0%. Statistical results revealed that the proposed UPLC method having good intermediate precision. The results are tabulated in Table 3.

S. No. Amitriptyline Pregabalin
Same Day Different day Same Day Different day
1 341828 357822 319170 410913
2 342788 357851 314107 418518
3 341949 350739 315144 412608
4 341435 351228 313306 419415
5 342587 354290 319057 417098
6 340564 357545 315434 416903
Avg 341859 354913 316036 415909
St. dev 807.3 3329 2501.2 3387
%RSD 0.2 0.9 0.8 0.8

Table 3: Method precision

Linearity and range

The linearity of the method was determined in the concentration range of 2.5-15 μg/ml for Amitriptyline and 18.75-112.5 μg/ml for Pregabalin. The graph plotted peak area versus concentration data and data were subjected to statistical analysis by using liner-regression. The results were tabulated in Tables 4, 5 and 6.

S. No. Pipetted from stock (ml) Volume of flask (ml) Concentration in ppm (Amitriptyline) Concentration in ppm (Pregabalin) %Linearity Level
1 0.25 10 2.5 18.75 25
2 0.5 10 5 37.5 50
3 0.75 10 7.5 56.25 75
4 1 10 10 75 100
5 0.25 10 12.5 93.75 125
6 0.5 10 15 112.5 150

Table 4: Linearity solutions of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin

Amitriptyline Pregabalin
Conc. (µg/ml) Average peak area Conc. (µg/ml) Average peak area
2.5 88037 18.75 77539
5 169866 37.5 150984
7.5 266793 56.25 232396
10 346920 75 315829
12.5 429505 93.75 377734
15 504725 112.5 457172

Table 5: Calibration data of the proposed method

Parameters Amitriptyline Pregabalin
Linearity range (µg/ml) 2.5 ppm-15 ppm 18.75 ppm-112.5 ppm
Regression line equation y=33755x+3292.2 y=4070x+1298.7
Correlation coefficient (r) 0.9992 0.9992
LOD (µg/ml) 0.02 0.51
LOQ (µg/ml) 0.061 1.55

Table 6: Optical characteristics of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin

LOD and LOQ

The Limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantification (LOQ) represents the concentration of the analyte that would yield signal to noise ratio of 3 for LOD and 10 for LOQ respectively. The results were tabulated in Table 7.

Active LOD(µg/mL) LOQ (µg/mL)
Amitriptyline 0.02 0.061
Pregabalin 0.51 1.55

Table 7: LOD and LOQ

Robustness

The robustness of the assay method was set up by introducing small changes in the chromatographic condition which included the percentage of Flow rate (0.1 ml/min and 0.3 ml/min), Mobile Phase (50 OPA: 50 ACN and 60 OPA: 40 ACN) and Temperature (20°C and 30°C). The results were tabulated in Table 8.

Method parameters Conditions Retention Time (RT) Amitriptyline Retention Time (RT) Pregabalin
Flow Rate+ 0.3 ml/min 1.6 1.92
Flow Rate- 0.1 ml/min 1.76 2.11
Mobile Phase+ 50 OPA: 50 CAN 1.76 2.13
Mobile Phase- 60 OPA: 40 CAN 1.68 2.01
Temperature+ 30°C 1.68 2.01
Temperature- 20°C 1.68 2.01

Table 8: Robustness studies of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin

Solution stability

The solution stability of the Amitriptyline and Pregabalin for the assay method was established and checked at room temperature for 24 h by leaving both the sample and standard solutions in tightly capped volumetric flasks. The assay results were found within the acceptance criteria for Amitriptyline and Pregabalin.

System suitability parameters

The system suitability of the system was checked by preparing six replicates injections of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin and the system is deemed suitable for use of plate number (N), resolution, and retention time of samples. The results were tabulated in Table 9.

Parameter Amitriptyline Pregabalin
Retention time 1.7 2.04
Plates 7254 2653
Resolution - 2.8

Table 9: System suitability parameters

Specificity and selectivity

Specificity is the ability of method to measure the analyte response in the presence of mixed analyte. The specificity of the method was established without any interference of placebos. The UPLC chromatograms recorded for the drug matrix (a mixture of the drug and placebos) observed that almost no interfering peaks within retention time of analyte range. Figures 5 and 6 shows the respective chromatogram for Amitriptyline and Pragabalin with a blank. Figure 6 shows that the selected drugs were well separated and hence the proposed UPLC method in this study was selective.

derpharmachemica-Blank-Chromatogram

Figure 5: Blank Chromatogram

derpharmachemica-Pregabalin-Chromatograms

Figure 6: Amitriptyline and Pregabalin Chromatograms

Stress degradation studies

Stability testing [21,22] is performed to warrant that drug products do not degrade until the self-life completion. Stability testing will play an important role in the process of drug product development and validation. The rationale of stability testing is to provide indication that how the quality of a drug substance or drug product differ with the influence of a variety of environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity and light. Based on the stability studies (long term, intermediate and accelerated studies) establishes a retest period for the drug substance or a shelf life for the drug product. The assay of drug product in stability samples needs to be analysed by using stability indicating parameters, as recommended by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines [23].

Preparation of stock solution

Weighed separately and transferred 10 mg of Amitriptyline and 18.75 mg of Pregabalin sample into a 100 ml and 25 ml clean dry volumetric flask, add 3/4th volume of diluent, sonicated for 5 min and make up to the volume with diluent.

Acid degradation studies

Take 1 ml of each sample stock solution of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin, added separately 1 ml of 2 N Hydrochloric acid was added and refluxed for 30 min at 60°C. The resultant solution was diluted to obtain 10 μg/ml, and 75 μg/ml solutions.

Alkali degradation studies

Take 1 ml of each sample stock solution of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin, added 1 ml of 2 N sodium hydroxide and refluxed for 30 min at 60°C. The resultant solution was diluted to obtain 10 μg/ml and 75 μg/ml solution.

Oxidation

Take 1 ml of each sample stock solution of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin and added separately 1 ml of 20% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The solutions were kept for 30 min at 60°C. The resultant solution was diluted to obtain 10 μg/ml & 75 μg/ml solution and the chromatograms were recorded to assess the stability of sample.

Dry heat degradation studies

The standard drug solution was placed in oven at 105°C for 1 h to study dry heat degradation. The resultant solution was diluted to 10 μg/ml and 75 μg/ml solution and the chromatograms were recorded.

Photo stability studies: (PG instruments T60 UV-visible spectrophotometer)

The photochemical stability of the drug was also studied by exposing the 100 μg/ml and 750 μg/ml solution to UV Light by keeping the beaker in UV Chamber for 1 day with 200 Watt hours/m2 in photo stability chamber. The resultant solution was diluted to obtain 10 μg/ml and 75 μg/ml solutions.

Neutral degradation studies

Stress testing under neutral conditions was studied by refluxing the drug in water for 1 h, temperature of 60°C. The resultant solution was diluted to 10 μg/ml and 75 μg/ml solutions. The results were tabulated in Table 10.

Stress conditions Active present after degradation (%)
Amitriptyline Rilpivirine
Acid 30 48
Alkali 30 48
Dry Heat 53 47
Oxidation 53 47
Photo Stability 53 47
Neutral 53 47

Table 10: Results of stress degradation studies

Results And Discussion

Method development and optimization of the chromatographic conditions

After number of experiments with different compositions of 0.1% OPA, methanol and acetonitrile tried with different columns (Acquity UPLC HSS PFP (75 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm and ACQUITY UPLC, with HSS T3 Column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm). The separation of peaks is not satisfactory. The good peak shape and maximum peak separation were achieved with the composition of mobile phase: A–0.1% OPA in water, B- Acetonitrile. Well separation, peak symmetry, repeatability and reproducibility were achieved with Acquity UPLC HSS C18 (100 mm × 1.8 μ). The optimum maximum wavelength was observed at 256 nm and established the flow rate of 0.2 ml/min for optimum separation and peak symmetry. Most of the HPLC methods till date used C-8 or C-18 columns with long run time and complex mobile phase compositions. Hence these attempts were directed towards the development of this method with common C18 column with good resolution. Different logical variations were tried to get good separation with less run time among the individual drugs and the solid drug dosages and the same modification tried in mobile phase composition, flow rate and temperature in gradient modes on different C18 columns with UPLC.

The percentage recovery was covered in range from 50.0% to 150.0% for Amitriptyline and Pregabalin in the combined dosage forms. The percentage of RSD value of replicate injections was less than 2.0% which indicates that this method is highly accurate. The method precision and intermediate precision of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin standard solution checked and % RSD intermediate precision and replicated sets were less the 2 percentage, which indicates that this method is highly precise. The calibration curve plotted for the Amitriptyline and Pregabalin and found it was linear over the concentration range of 2.5-15 μg/ml for Amitriptyline and 18.75-112.5 μg/ml for Pregabalin respectively. The data subjected towards peak area versus concentration by linear regression analysis, and the correlation coefficient (r) was obtained (0.99). The subjected statistical data proved that the proposed method was linear. The results of Limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantification (LOQ) data established for both the analytes. The signal-to-noise ratio for the LOD and LOQ were well within the acceptance criteria. The results are as shown above.

The robustness of the assay method was established by implemented the minor changes in the chromatographic condition which included the percentage of Flow rate (0.1 ml/min and 0.3 mL/min), Mobile Phase (50 OPA: 50 ACN and 60 OPA: 40 ACN) and Temperature (20°C and 30 °C). The developed method was unaffected by the minor deliberated changes; it indicated the proposed method was robust. Based on the degradation study results, it was observed that the drug gets slowly degraded in acidic and alkali conditions over a period of time and the degradation of drug resulted decrease the elution. The active present after degradation studies results were tabulated in Table 10. All the degradation solution were injected 10 μl each, as per chromatographic conditions and the chromatograms were recorded to assess the stability of sample.

Conclusion

Stress testing (or forced degradation studies) is one of the most critical criteria in pharmaceutical industries in method development. A simple, expeditious, accurate and precise stability-indicating UPLC analytical method was developed and validated for the quantitative analysis of Amitriptyline and Pregabalin in bulk drugs and combined dosage forms. The present developed UPLC method proved that for separation of different degradation products along with the pure drugs and capable of giving faster retention times with good resolution. The method was exhibited an excellent performance in terms of sensitivity, repeatability and swift. Thus the method could be useful not only for assay but also for monitoring the degradation products during the development as per the ICH guide lines. Hence the proposed method can be applied to the analysis of routine quality control samples. When compared with other methods, this method will decrease the consumption of solvent, time and man power. Hence the method is fit for regular pharmaceutical use.

Acknowledgement

Authors are very thankful to Vice Chancellor and Dean R & D VFSTR, for providing the library facilities for literature survey to carry out entire study. Authors are thankful to Syngene International Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore, India for providing Amitriptyline and Pregabalin working standards as gift samples. Authors are also thankful to Spectrum Pharma Labs, AP, India, for providing instrumental facilities to carry out research work.

References